Thousands of teachers are going to be laid off. We must do something now to save our kids.
Then the wet blanket at EIA has to drop these party pooping steamers:
In 2003, California issued 20,000 pink slips, and only 3,000 teachers lost their jobs. The percentage will be higher this time around, but it is likely that a majority of the pink-slipped will be called back. So why so much angst? Because state law requires districts to give teachers what amounts to five months’ notice of a possible layoff. More notice is better than less if you knew you were definitely losing your job, but months of uncertainty only exacerbates the problem.
Then we get stories about local teachers of the year in Burbank and Santa Barbara County receiving pink slips with zero mention of why. What kind of system forces you to get rid of teachers of the year and keep others?
But why get caught up in such flummoxing factoids? CTA certainly doesn’t. Here are few rules for bargaining during trying times like ours, where kids, communities, and the general welfare of our democratic society are at stake, as sign-swinging screamers have recently reminded us:
* “Roll over current contract without re-opening any articles. Maintaining salary and benefits at current levels is a priority; keeping the status quo is a constructive victory.”
* “Do not agree to freeze step and column costs temporarily.”
* “Do not trade salary for jobs; in an effort to save positions, you could lose both.”
* “Do not agree to furlough days.”
* “Do not agree to or advocate for divisive budget cutting proposals, such as cutting certain positions (e.g. counselors, librarians or Education Support Professionals/classified).”
At least CTA had a pink background on their website a few weeks back. Solidarity. For the tenured. The rest get sent packing in a puff of pinkness. The hypocrisy is galling.